California Canning Peach Growers v. Williams
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This action was commenced by the association against E. R. and Frances 0. Williams, husband and wife, on two common counts, the first alleging that between designated dates the plaintiff at the special instance and request of defendants furnished, paid, and laid out to and for the use and benefit of the defendants a designated sum of money which defendants agreed to repay with interest; and the second alleging the same indebtedness due from the defendants to plaintiff on an open and current book account. Defendants answered denying the allegations of the complaint, and defendant E.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hurtel v. Albert Cohn, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Shelley v. HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Spotton v. DyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Gianelli v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Verzan v. McGregorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pacific Portland Cement Co. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Smith v. BearCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Body-Steffner Co. v. Flotill Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1944
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.