Legal Opinion

Denman v. City of Pasadena

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1929No. Docket No. 7111PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

The plaintiff sued for damages for personal injuries resulting from the collapse of a temporary wooden “grandstand” erected for the convenience of spectators at festivities known as the ‘ ‘ Tournament of Roses, ’ ’ held in the City of Pasadena. Demurrers to the complaint were sustained without leave to amend. A motion for leave to amend was later denied and judgment was entered for the defendants. The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment upon a typewritten transcript.

The plaintiff sued the City of Pasadena, its “Board of Directors,” the city manager, chief of police and the chief…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Philbrook v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Miller v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Little v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Brands v. St. Louis Car Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  5. Stewart v. DouglassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stowe v. Fritzie Hotels, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. C & H. FOODS CO. v. Hartford Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. People v. FreemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Youngblood v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Thurman v. CluneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API