Little v. Union Oil Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCashin, J.
Action by appellant H. 0. Little against respondent Union Oil Company of California, a corporation.
Appellant by his amended complaint alleges in the form of two separate causes of action facts arising from the same transaction. As a first cause of action it is alleged that on August 24, 1923, a writing—in part a printed form used by respondent in the conduct of its business as a dealer in gasoline, and in part typewritten—was caused to be prepared in duplicate by one A. R. Atwood at the office of respondent in San Francisco, California, the writing being in words and figures as follows:
“Memora…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Lindsay v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Horton v. Travelers InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Fuller v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Beazell v. SchraderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- B & P DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. City of SaratogaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Herbert P. Caplan v. John H. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Marks v. Walter G. McCarty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1949
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.