Legal Opinion

Miller v. City of Palo Alto

California Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1929No. Docket No. S.F. 12612PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

This appeal is by the plaintiffs from a judgment against them rendered after a demurrer to their complaint had been sustained upon the ground that said complaint failed to state a cause of action, and plaintiffs had declined to amend. The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs Stephen and Ida M. Miller are husband and wife and at the times mentioned therein were the owners of certain described real property in the county of Santa Clara, California, upon which certain buildings were situated; that said buildings were insured against fire by the other plaintiffs; that on or about the ninth day…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mayor of Savannah v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  2. City of Louisville v. HehemannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Texas Highway Department v. WeberTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Customer Co. v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Osborn v. City of WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Sheffet v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API