Stewart v. Douglass
California Supreme Court
■ The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The court below sustained a demurrer to the fourth amended complaint, denied the application of the plaintiff to file a fifth amended complaint and thereupon rendered judgment dismissing the action. From this judgment the plaintiff appeals.
It was not error for the court to refuse to allow further amendments to the complaint. When a demurrer is sustained to a complaint it is within the discretion of the court either to allow an amended complaint to be filed or to give judgment forthwith in favor of the defendant. The appellate court will in every such case sustain the action of the court…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kleinclaus v. DutardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by29 opinions
- Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Ryan v. North Alaska Salmon Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Feldesman v. McGovernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Schultz v. SteinbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.