Legal Opinion

Thurman v. Clune

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1942No. Civ. 13005PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of defendants after trial before a jury in an action to recover damages for personal injuries caused by the alleged negligence of defendants, plaintiff appeals.

The undisputed facts are:

March 24, 1938, plaintiff suffered injuries when she was struck in the mouth by a hockey puck while watching an ice hockey match in a pavilion known as the Ice Palace. The pavilion was owned by the defendant Ice Palace, a corporation, which had entered into an agreement with the Associated Student Body of the University of Southern California for the playing of the ice hockey match…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. James v. R. I. Auditorium, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1938
  2. Thurman v. Ice PalaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Denman v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Doyle v. McPhersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. People v. FlintCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blank v. Palo Alto-Stanford Hospital CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Barton v. North Slope Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Tite v. Omaha Coliseum Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Dillenbeck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Shurman v. Fresno Ice Rink Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API