Legal Opinion
C & H. FOODS CO. v. Hartford Ins. Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 1984No. B004275PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCLOSKY, J.
Plaintiffs C & H Foods Co. (C & H), a division of Kwik-Serv Foods, Inc. (Kwik-Serv), Frank Cottle (Cottle) and Fred W. Harris (Harris) purport to “appeal from the January 5, 1983 Superior Court’s Order to the effect that a portion of the First Amended Complaint be sustained without leave to amend, and from the March 24, 1983 Superior Court’s Order to the effect that the First and Second Causes of Action of the Second Amended Complaint be dismissed without leave to amend.” An order sustaining a demurrer is a nonappealable order. We treat the notice of appeal as taken from…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Silberg v. California Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Unruh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Barrera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Estate of Tucker Ex Rel. Tucker v. InterscopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Hambrecht & Quist Venture Partners v. American Medical International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Amir Soltani Amir Dowlatshahi Ruben R. Vega Abdul K. Kabir v. Western & Southern Life Insurance Company, a Corporation, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Pulver v. Avco Financial ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.