Legal Opinion

Youngblood v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1958No. Civ. 22560PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of non-suit in favor of defendants Max Rosenberg and Sons, a co-partnership, City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Flood Control District. The action is one for recovery of damages due to flooding and erosion of plaintiff’s property during heavy rains of January, 1952.

Reviewing a nonsuit, we of course accept that evidence which is most favorable to plaintiff. His property is situated in the Pacific Palisades area of Los Angeles County, is hillside property known as 708 Greentree Road. He purchased the property in 1947 and built a home on a leveled area…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Weinstock v. EisslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. May Department Stores Company, Inc. v. DevercelliDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Sheffet v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Zander v. Texaco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Siskiyou County Farm Bureau v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API