Legal Opinion
Carey v. Retirement Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 23, 1955No. Civ. 16224PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court in and for the County of San Francisco denying a petition for a peremptory writ of mandate in a proceeding brought to compel the Retirement Board of the City and County of San Francisco to pay a widow’s pension under section 169 of the city charter. Petitioner has been receiving benefits from respondent since the death of her husband under the provisions of section 168.3 of said charter, but contends that she has the right to receive a pension under section 169, which in her case would be a larger sum than that which she is now…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dillon v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Dryden v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Fay v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Jordan v. Retirement BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Hammond v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Reed v. AlbaneseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
- Century Plaza Hotel Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Phillis v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Houghton v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.