Legal Opinion

Phillis v. City of Santa Barbara

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 6, 1964No. Civ. 27834PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ASHBURN, J. *

In separate counts of a single complaint plaintiff J. D. Phillis, fireman, and J. J. O’Brien, policeman, seek relief, principally declaratory, with respect to their pension rights under the Charter of the City of Santa Barbara. The controversy grows out of a charter amendment which substitutes a fixed pension for a fluctuating one and imposes other limitations upon the pension right which are plainly to the disadvantage of the employees and accompanied by no compensatory advantages.

The trial court held that the actions are barred by section 338, subdivision 1, of the Code of…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lien Huynh v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Opinion of the JusticesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. Bowler v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  5. Healdsburg Police Officers Ass'n v. City of HealdsburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API