Legal Opinion

Century Plaza Hotel Co. v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 1970No. Civ. 34667PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUNN, J.

By its taxpayers’ action (Code Civ. Proc., § 526a), plaintiff sought to enjoin defendants from the enforcement of ordinance No. 136,900 and for a ruling regarding validity of the ordinance, which was enacted by defendant city to become operative October 1, 1968. The parties stipulated to the few facts necessary to a decision and brief additional testimony was received, following which the trial court held the ordinance was valid. Plaintiff appeals.

The ordinance, a so-called “tipplers’ tax,” added section 21.5.03.1 to the Los Angeles Municipal Code, imposing an excise tax of 5…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Chavez v. SargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Rivera v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Marsh & McLennan of California, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. CHIATELLO v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. The Pines v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API