Century Plaza Hotel Co. v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUNN, J.
By its taxpayers’ action (Code Civ. Proc., § 526a), plaintiff sought to enjoin defendants from the enforcement of ordinance No. 136,900 and for a ruling regarding validity of the ordinance, which was enacted by defendant city to become operative October 1, 1968. The parties stipulated to the few facts necessary to a decision and brief additional testimony was received, following which the trial court held the ordinance was valid. Plaintiff appeals.
The ordinance, a so-called “tipplers’ tax,” added section 21.5.03.1 to the Los Angeles Municipal Code, imposing an excise tax of 5…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Chavez v. SargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Rivera v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Marsh & McLennan of California, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- CHIATELLO v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- The Pines v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.