Legal Opinion

Abbott v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1958No. L. A. 24354; L. A. 24355; L. A. 24356; L. A. 24357; L. A. 24358PublishedCited by 169 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

In these five eases, consolidated for trial, plaintiffs appeal from adverse judgments in their actions seeking to enforce pension payments upon a fluctuating basis (i.e., based upon salaries currently being paid from time to time) rather than in fixed amounts determined at the time the pension is granted. Defendants are the city of Los Angeles and its board of pension commissioners. We have concluded that charter amendments by which fixed payment pensions were substituted for fluctuating may not properly be applied to plaintiffs, and that the judgments should be reversed.

The 673 plaintiffs in…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Allen v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by169 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Miller v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of La HabraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API