Legal Opinion
Jordan v. Retirement Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 1939No. Civ. 10656PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, J. —
Respondent’s demurrer to appellant’s petition for a writ of mandate was sustained without leave to amend, and from the judgment entered thereon this appeal was taken.
The purpose of the proceeding was to compel the respondent board to grant appellant’s application for a widow’s pension; and the facts of the case, as they are alleged in the petition for the writ, are as follows: Frank Jordan was appointed a member of the fire department of the city and county of San Francisco on March 31, 1905. In February, 1914, while engaged in the performance of his duties as a hoseman he was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pennie v. ReisSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- O'Dea v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Klench v. Board of Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Pennie v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Casserly v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Benson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Unzueta v. Ocean View School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Packer v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Sweesy v. Los Angeles County Peace Officers' Retirement BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.