Legal Opinion
Moran v. Morneau
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 27, 2007No. AC 27435PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
In this breach of contract action, the pro se defendant, Ricky A. Momeau, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Michel Moran. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) he was denied due process of law in violation of the Connecticut constitution because two state marshals refused to serve process on the plaintiff, (2) the court improperly excluded evidence regarding his constitutional claims and his claim of duress, and (3) the court’s calculation of damages was improper. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Westport Taxi Service, Inc. v. Westport Transit DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Ajadi v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- United Coastal Industries, Inc. v. Clearheart Construction Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Coughlin v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kelley v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Moran v. MorneauConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Driska v. PierceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Kaye v. HousmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Moran v. MorneauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.