Legal Opinion

Kaye v. Housman

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 18, 2018No. AC40187PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavine, J.

In this housing court matter, the defendant, Douglas Housman, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Richelle Kaye, following a hearing in damages. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court (1) improperly held a hearing in damages in view of his operative answer and four special defenses and (2) denied him the right to due process because the court did not adjudicate fully his timely filed answer and four special defenses. 1 We reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The record reveals the following procedural history. In April, 2016, the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Grant v. BassmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. City of Danbury v. Dana Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Coughlin v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. U.S. Bank National Assn., Trustee v. BlowersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  5. Wilson v. TroxlerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bank of America, N.A. v. GonzalezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  2. O & G Industries, Inc. v. American Home Assurance Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API