Legal Opinion
Driska v. Pierce
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 7, 2008No. AC 28891PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBINSON, J.
The defendants, Jeffrey D. Pierce and Linda Pierce, appeal from the judgment of the trial court that issued a permanent injunction, preventing them from operating an all terrain vehicle (ATV) park on their property. On appeal, the defendants challenge certain legal conclusions and the evidentiary findings of the court. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following factual and procedural history is relevant for our discussion. On September 22, 2006, the plaintiff, Bruce E. Driska, the zoning enforcement officer for the city of Middletown, issued a cease and desist…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Gallo v. BarileSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Trumbull Falls, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Breen v. Synthes-Stratec, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- 200 Associates, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goulet v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- JMS Newberry, LLC v. Kaman Aerospace Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Stamford v. Ten Rugby Street, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016