Legal Opinion
Coughlin v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 10, 2004No. SC 17046PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*490 Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The plaintiff, Christopher M. Coughlin, appeals1 from the judgment of the trial court, rendered following the trial court’s granting of a directed verdict in favor of the defendants, Arnold S. Anderson, Frank Gilbride II, and the law firm of Gilbride, Tusa, Last and Spellane (law firm),2 at the close of the plaintiffs casein-chief. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly: (1) (a) granted the defendants’ motions for a directed verdict on the basis of the Connecticut Marketable Title Act (act); General Statutes § 47-33b et seq.; despite the defendants not having…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. WargoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- DuBose v. CarabettaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Pawlinski v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Bennett v. Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Il Giardino, LLC v. Belle Haven Land Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Perez-Dickson v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Sullivan v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- McBurney v. CirilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Ventura v. Town of E. HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Riccio v. HARBOUR VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM ASS'NSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.