Legal Opinion
Moran v. Morneau
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 7, 2011No. AC 31699PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
In this foreclosure action, the court rendered judgment of foreclosure by sale and, prior to either the sale or the rendering of a supplemental judgment, determined the parties’ priorities with respect to the subject property. The sole issue to be decided in this appeal is whether the trial court’s determination of priorities is an appealable final judgment. We conclude that it is not and, accordingly, dismiss the appeal.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to this appeal. The defendant Ricky A. Momeau owns the subject property commonly known as 399 Main…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Reynolds v. RamosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Willow Funding Co., L.P. v. Grencom AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- City National Bank v. StoeckelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- BROWN AND BROWN, INC. v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gonzalez v. Ocwen Home Loan ServicingDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Citibank, N.A. v. LindlandConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- J & E Investment Co. v. AthanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Saunders v. KDFBS, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
- Moran v. MorneauConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.