State ex rel. McGowan v. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Mandamus; Adequate Legal Remedy
In his propositions of law, McGowan asserts that he is entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel CMHA to provide him with access to the requested records pursuant to R.C. 149.43. Exceptions to disclosure must be strictly construed against the public records custodian, and the burden to establish an exception is on the custodian. State ex rel. James v. Ohio State Univ. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 168, 169, 637 N.E.2d 911, 912.
CMHA does not claim that any of the requested records are exempt from disclosure. In fact, most of the requested records appear to be personnel…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. SchroederOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. James v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Multimedia Inc. v. SnowdenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. WHIO-TV-7 v. LoweOhio Supreme Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State ex rel. Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Morgan v. City of New LexingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Besser v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Besser v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. v. PetroOhio Supreme Court · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.