Legal Opinion

State ex rel. James v. Ohio State University

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1994No. 94-833PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

At issue in this case is whether documents contained in promotion and tenure files maintained by the university are public records subject to disclosure under R.C. 149.43(B), or whether the records meet any of the exceptions contained in R.C. 149.43(A)(1) so as to prevent disclosure.

The university does not dispute that it is a state agency and public office under R.C. 149.011. Rather, it argues that the records are excepted from disclosure under R.C. 149.43(A)(1). In considering the university’s arguments, we are mindful that exceptions to disclosure are to be construed strictly against the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Multimedia, Inc. v. WhalenOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. LesakOhio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Jones-KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Hurt v. Liberty Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. SchroederOhio Supreme Court · 1996

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API