Legal Opinion

State ex rel. WHIO-TV-7 v. Lowe

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1997No. Nos. 95-2224 and 95-2356PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

This case presents the issue of whether information that the criminal prosecutor has disclosed to the defendant for discovery purposes pursuant to Crim.R. 16, and therefore ordinarily would not be considered to be work product or trial preparation materials, is precluded from release to the public pursuant to the public records doctrine.

Appellant and relator argue that because the prosecution has already disclosed to the defendant the subject information pursuant to the criminal discovery rules, the information cannot be deemed “work product” and thus is subject to release pursuant to Ohio’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. State v. HennessOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Fuqua v. AlexanderOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. United States v. KravetzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  4. State ex rel. Morgan v. StricklandOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State ex rel. Gannett Satellite Information Network v. ShireyOhio Supreme Court · 1997

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API