State ex rel. Multimedia Inc. v. Snowden
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Mandamus is the proper remedy to compel compliance with Ohio’s Public Records Act, R.C. 149.43. State ex rel. Steckman v. Jackson (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 420, 426, 639 N.E.2d 83, 88-89. Snowden concedes that the requested records are “records” for purposes of R.C. 149.43 and that they are held by the city’s Police Division, which is a “public office.” See R.C. 149.011(A) and (G). However, Snowden asserts that the records are excepted from disclosure under R.C. 149.43(A)(2) as “confidential law enforcement investigatory records.”
R.C. 149.43(A)(1) excepts confidential law enforcement…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Warren Newspapers, Inc. v. HutsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Fox v. Cuyahoga County Hospital SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Thomas v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Officer Melissa Kallstrom v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Morgan v. City of New LexingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.