Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Steckman v. Jackson
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 7, 1994No. Nos. 92-2254, 93-1336 and 92-1758PublishedCited by 257 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
I
The Issues
These three cases come to us each in a different procedural posture from the others. In case No. 92-2254, the designee of a defendant in a criminal case, whose case has not yet been tried, has filed an R.C. 149.43(C) mandamus action to obtain records that are alleged to be public. In case No. 93-1336, we have a criminal defendant who was convicted and whose conviction was affirmed on appeal seeking public records by way of an R.C. 149.43(C) mandamus action to be used, presumably, in postconviction relief proceedings. An additional wrinkle in case No. 93-1336 is that the records are…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Polikoff v. AdamOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Amato v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. Scanlon v. DetersOhio Supreme Court · 1989
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by257 opinions
- John W. Byrd, Jr. v. Terry L. Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Gilbert v. Summit CountyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BeyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
252 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.