Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Besser v. Ohio State University

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 2000No. 99-394PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Per curiam

The Bessers assert that they are entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel respondents to provide access to the withheld records concerning the Park Medical Center transaction. R.C. 149.43 requires complete access to all public records upon request unless the requested records fall within one of the specified exemptions. State ex rel. The Miami Student v. Miami Univ. (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 168, 170, 680 N.E.2d 956, 958. One of the specified exemptions covers “[r]ecords the release of which is prohibited by state or federal law.” R.C. 149.43(A)(1)(p); State ex rel. Nix v. Cleveland (1998), 83…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Plain Dealer v. Ohio Dept. of InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Rice v. CertainTeed Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McCaffrey v. Mahoning County Prosecutor's OfficeOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State Ex Rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Toledo-Lucas County Port AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State ex rel. Leslie v. Ohio Housing Finance AgencyOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State Ex Rel. Carr v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State Ex Rel. Dawson v. Bloom-Carroll Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 2011

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API