Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Besser v. Ohio State University

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2000No. 99-394PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Per curiam

In reviewing the records withheld by OSU, the precept guiding our analysis is that the inherent, fundamental policy of R.C. 149.43 is to promote open government, not restrict it. State ex rel. The Miami Student v. Miami Univ. (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 168, 171, 680 N.E.2d 956, 959. Consistent with this policy, exceptions to disclosure must be strictly construed against the public records custodian, and the custodian bears the burden to establish the applicability of an exception. State ex rel. McGowan v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth. (1997) , 78 Ohio St.3d 518, 519, 678 N.E.2d 1388, 1389.

With these…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A. v. Arter & HaddenOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Minuteman, Inc. v. AlexanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State ex rel. Plain Dealer v. Ohio Dept. of InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. University of Toledo FoundationOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Pyromatics, Inc. v. PetruzielloOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State ex rel. Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer, Div. of Gannett Satellite Info. Network, Inc. v. DupuisOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Hurt v. Liberty Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State Ex Rel. Carr v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API