Legal Opinion

Houghton v. Harris

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 9, 1955No. 175PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaRNHill, C. J.

The judgment signed by Frizzelle, J., is not void for want of jurisdiction. He acquired jurisdiction at term and signed the final judgment out of term and out of the county by consent of the parties. Edmundson v. Edmundson, 222 N.C. 181, 22 S.E. 2d 237; Killian v. Chair Co., 202 N.C. 23, 161 S.E. 546; Strickland v. Kornegay, 240 N.C. 758, 83 S.E. 2d 903.

The rule that a second action involving the same subject matter as one theretofore duly instituted will be dismissed whenever the existence of the former action is called to the attention of the court by answer or other proper plea is not…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bruton v. . Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Gaither Corporation v. SkinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Snyder v. Kenan Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Bruton v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Edmundson v. EdmundsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. London v. LondonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Keith v. GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. McNair Ex Rel. McNair v. GoodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Bradford v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Youse v. Duke Energy Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API