Legal Opinion

Bruton v. Carolina Power & Light Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1940PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

While the complaint does not undertake to state two separate and distinct causes of action, it, in fact, alleges two causes of action and was so interpreted and treated by the court below.

The first cause of action alleges the wrongful use of the water of the Yadkin Eiver by the defendant, an upper riparian owner, which deprives the plaintiffs of their right to the natural and uninterrupted flow of the stream and which has caused the erosion and washing away of the plaintiffs’ land — a continuing wrong which .amounts to a taking of plaintiffs’ land or 'substantial interest therein.

As to this…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Murray v. CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. United States v. California & Oregon Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Baird v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. City of Portsmouth v. WeissSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Reid v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Gaither Corporation v. SkinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Roberts v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Smith v. PateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API