Legal Opinion

London v. London

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1967No. 208PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

Defendant’s sole exception is the one which the law entered for him when he gave notice of appeal. “An appeal is itself an exception to the judgment . . . but limits the review to the question of whether the findings of fact are sufficient to support the judgment or whether error of law appears on the face of the record.” 1 Strong, N. C. Index, Appeal and Error § 21 (1957).

In his brief, defendant assumes that the order from which he appeals was entered in the second suit, Case No. 5314, and he challenges the authority of the court to award plaintiff alimony pendente lite in that case after it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDowell v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Houghton v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Matter of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. JamesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Whitaker v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Truckee-Carson Irrigation District v. WyattNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Matter of PeirceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API