Legal Opinion

Gaither Corporation v. Skinner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1955No. 26PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The doctrine of res judicata embodies the general rule that any right, fact, or question in issue and directly adjudicated on or necessarily involved in the determination of an action before a competent court in which a judgment or decree is rendered on the merits is conclusively settled by the judgment therein and cannot again be litigated between the parties and privies. Armfield v. Moore, 44 N.C. 157; Southern Distributing Co. v. Carraway, 196 N.C. 58, 144 S.E. 535; 50 C.J.S., Judgments, section 592.

In short, the general rule is that “A final judgment rendered by a court of competent…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Bruton v. . Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Jarman v. OffuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Armfield v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1852
  5. Bruton v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Christian v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Reid v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Quicksilver LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API