Legal Opinion

Edmundson v. Edmundson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1942PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

Appellant, in challenging the correctness and validity of the judgment from which this appeal is taken, directs his attack solely upon the validity and effect of the consent judgment signed at chambers in Kinston in the Sixth Judicial District on 29 September, 1939, by Williams, Judge resident of the Fourth Judicial District.

Four contentions, stated as questions involved on this appeal, and quoted herein, are raised and debated in brief filed in this Court. We are of opinion, however, and hold that, on the present record, the judgment may not be successfully attacked on either ground. '

First:…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gardiner v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Bynum v. . PoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Henry J. Heryey & Co. v. EdmundsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Bunn v. BunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. In Re BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Shepard v. . LeonardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API