Legal Opinion

Keith v. Glenn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1964No. 673PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

The basic question presented by plaintiff’s appeal is this:’ May plaintiff maintain his action against defendant and at the same time rely on the release given by defendant to defeat the counterclaim? Unless we are to depart from logic and overrule . prior decisions of this Court, the answer must be “No.”

A consummated agreement to compromise and settle disputed claims is conclusive and binding on the parties to the agreement and those who knowingly accept its benefits. Bradford v. Kelly, 260 N.C. 382, 132 S.E. 2d 886; Cannon v. Parker, 249 N.C. 279, 106 S.E. 2d 229; Houghton v. Harris, 243…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Greene v. SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Holland v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Snyder v. Kenan Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Bradford v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Rudasill v. . FallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Tolson v. HodgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  2. Bolton Corp. v. T. A. Loving Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Smithwick v. CrutchfieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. McKinney v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Bongardt v. FrinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API