Legal Opinion

City and County of San Francisco v. Patterson

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 15, 1988No. A039002PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RACANELLI, P. J.

This case concerns the validity of a preelection removal of an initiative ordinance from the San Francisco ballot.

Facts

We outline the procedural/factual background to the questions presented.

Appellant Robert Guichard was a proponent of a petition for an initiative ordinance to be submitted to the electorate at a special election scheduled for June 2, 1987. The ballot proposal, entitled “Stop the Great Land Give away Ordinance” (Proposition D), provided in essence that the City and County of San Francisco and the San Francisco Unified School District (collectively…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Hyland v. WonderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Bighorn-Desert View Water Agency v. VerjilCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Herbst Gaming, Inc. v. Sec'y of StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Glover v. Concerned Citizens for Fuji ParkNevada Supreme Court · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API