Herbst Gaming, Inc. v. Sec'y of State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from a district court order declining to remove the Nevada Clean Indoor Air Act initiative (NCIAA) from the November 2006 ballot. We take this opportunity to clarify what types of objections are properly considered in a preelection chai-*880lenge to an initiative. While challenges based on alleged procedural irregularities and specific constitutional or statutory requirements for initiatives may be considered preelection, those that allege that a measure, if approved, may violate substantive federal or state constitutional provisions are not appropriate for preelection…
3Cases cited38 opinions
- Round Hill General Improvement District v. NewmanNevada Supreme Court · 1981
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Coppernoll v. ReedWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- McAlpine v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by41 opinions
- Miller v. BurkNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Cote v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Committee to Recall Menendez v. WellsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Flamingo Paradise Gaming, LLC v. ChanosNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Olson v. Town of Cottage GroveWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.