Legal Opinion
Glover v. Concerned Citizens for Fuji Park
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided September 6, 2002No. 39601PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*490OPINION
2Per curiam
Concerned Citizens for Fuji Park and Fairgrounds submitted an initiative petition to the Carson City Clerk/Recorder, which proposed that an ordinance be enacted to preserve Fuji Park and Carson City Fairgrounds in perpetuity. Because the Carson City Board of Supervisors took no action on the initiative petition, Concerned Citizens filed the underlying petition for a writ of mandamus in the district court to compel the Clerk to place the initiative on the ballot. The district court granted the writ of mandamus and directed the Clerk and Board to place the initiative on the ballot.
The…
3Cases cited19 opinions
- McKay v. Board of Sup'rs of Carson CityNevada Supreme Court · 1986
- Robert E. v. JUSTICE COURT OF RENO TP.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Forman v. Eagle Thrifty Drugs and Markets, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1973
- Rogers v. HellerNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Stumpf v. LauNevada Supreme Court · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by27 opinions
- D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- Leven v. FreyNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- Harris Associates v. Clark County School DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- Garvin v. Ninth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Herbst Gaming, Inc. v. Sec'y of StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.