Legal Opinion

County of Alameda v. Carleson

California Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1971No. S.F. 22820; Sac. 7898; S.F. 22816; S.F. 22817PublishedCited by 223 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BURKE, J.

These consolidated cases involve questions of interpretation of certain provisions of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 602, subd, (a)), which set forth the requisites for a state plan for aid and services to needy families with children (AFDC program). At issue is the important question whether California’s plan, as set forth in the Welfare and Institutions Code and implemented by regulations promulgated by the California Department of Social Welfare, conforms to the provisions of the federal Act.

In S.F. 22820 (hereafter “the Alameda action”) plaintiff counties brought an…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by223 opinions

  1. Shea v. VialpandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. California Assn. of Psychology Providers v. RankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Piambino v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. Green v. ObledoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. California Housing Finance Agency v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

218 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API