Bighorn-Desert View Water Agency v. Verjil
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KENNARD, J.
In November 1996, California voters adopted Proposition 218, which added articles XIII C and XIIID to the California Constitution. In Richmond v. Shasta Community Services Dist. (2004) 32 Cal.4th 409 [9 Cal.Rptr.3d 121, 83 P.3d 518] (Richmond), we construed article XIII D as it applies to fees that a local public water district charged for making new service connections to its domestic water delivery system. We concluded that those connection charges were not “assessments” or “property-related fees or charges” within the meaning of article XIII D. (Richmond, supra, at pp.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- California Cannabis Coalition v. City of UplandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Mt. Hawley Insurance v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Greene v. Marin County Flood Control & Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- McAllister v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- City of San Buenaventura v. United Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.