Legal Opinion

Bighorn-Desert View Water Agency v. Verjil

California Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 2006No. S127535PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

In November 1996, California voters adopted Proposition 218, which added articles XIII C and XIIID to the California Constitution. In Richmond v. Shasta Community Services Dist. (2004) 32 Cal.4th 409 [9 Cal.Rptr.3d 121, 83 P.3d 518] (Richmond), we construed article XIII D as it applies to fees that a local public water district charged for making new service connections to its domestic water delivery system. We concluded that those connection charges were not “assessments” or “property-related fees or charges” within the meaning of article XIII D. (Richmond, supra, at pp.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. California Cannabis Coalition v. City of UplandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Mt. Hawley Insurance v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Greene v. Marin County Flood Control & Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. McAllister v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. City of San Buenaventura v. United Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API