Bishop v. City of San Jose
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BURKE, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment declaring the prevailing wage provisions found in certain sections of the Labor Code to be inapplicable to the employees of defendant city, and denying relief sought by way of injunction and damages. 1 As hereinafter appears, we have concluded that the trial court ruled correctly with respect to the prevailing wage law, that no other ground for reversal has been shown, and that the judgment should be affirmed.
Plaintiff contends that from 1958 to 1966 defendant city unlawfully failed to pay its electricians the prevailing rate of per diem wages…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by194 opinions
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
189 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.