Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Nahavandian

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 2004PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlszewski, J.

¶ 1 Shahram Nahavandian (appellant/defendant) appeals from his sentence imposed by the Court of Common Pleas of Northumberland County (Sacavage, P.J.). A jury convicted appellant of delivery of a controlled substance (three counts), possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance (three counts), possession of a controlled substance (two counts), conspiracy, and drug delivery resulting in death.

¶ 2 The basic facts of this case are simple. On November 24,1999, Sherry Dunk-leberger, Michael Moyer, and Misty Derk were partying. They wanted to purchase some heroin for personal use, so…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. ChampneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. BracaliellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. LudwigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. MatthewsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. CostaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API