Commonwealth v. Ludwig
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Chief Justice CAPPY.1
This appeal presents a constitutional challenge to a criminal statute, 18 Pa.C.S. § 2506, “Drug delivery resulting in death,” for vagueness, because the statute fails to sufficiently set forth the mental state required for criminal liability. Additionally, we are called upon to determine whether the trial court erred in granting Appellee Gregory Ludwig’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus based upon the Commonwealth’s failure to establish a prima facie case under Section 2506. For the reasons that follow, we hold that Section 2506 is not unconstitutionally vague…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Commonwealth v. DrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- Buffalo Township v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SantosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- In Re Fc IIISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. WindsloweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. ClaffeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. PackerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.