Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bracalielly

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 16, 1995PublishedCited by 140 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Justice.

This consolidated appeal requires us to determine whether we should bar the instant prosecutions. Appellants contend that because these prosecutions arise from conduct which forms part of the same criminal episode on which previous prosecutions were based, 18 Pa.C.S. § 110 requires their dismissal. The Commonwealth argues that the instant prosecutions are not based on conduct constituting the same criminal episode as the previous prosecutions and therefore do not violate 18 Pa.C.S. § 110. Because the inquiry as to whether a series of criminal acts constitutes a single…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. CampanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. HudeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Dorn v. Stanhope Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by140 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. ManleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API