Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Griffin
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 24, 2002PublishedCited by 301 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHudock, J.
¶ 1 This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence entered after a jury found Appellant guilty of possessing a controlled substance (cocaine) and possessing a controlled substance with intent to deliver (cocaine). 1 For the reasons explained below, we affirm.
¶2 The trial court has explained the facts underlying this appeal in the following apt manner:
On August 6, 1997, Philadelphia Police Officers Merrick and Bolds were patrolling the area of Price and Crittenden in the 14th District of the City of Philadelphia. At approximately 3:45 a.m., the officers noticed two persons inside of a truck…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. DeversSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. MorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by301 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MourySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. HansleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. TiradoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. McAfeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
296 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.