Legal Opinion

STATE Ex Rel REED v. KUZIRIAN

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1961PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

Defendant, by the assumed business naxhe of Oregon Contact Lens Service, had been engaged in selling and fitting contact lenses. This proceeding was brought to enjoin the defendant from doing certain of the acts thereby involved which were alleged to have required the professional knowledge of a doctor of medicine or of optometry. The trial court issued an injunction restraining the acts complained of. Defendant appeals. Plaintiffs have cross-appealed as to one portion of the decree. We will discuss the cross-appeal later.

Defendant was a dispensing optician. The state requires no license nor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seifert v. Buhl Optical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State Ex Rel. Sisemore v. Standard Optical Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Frank v. SouthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Dellinger v. Arkansas State Board of OptometrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. Kenco Optics, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. People Ex Rel. Watson v. House of VisionIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Ketring v. SturgesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  4. State Ex Rel. Londerholm v. DoolinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  5. High v. Ridgeway's OpticiansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API