Ketring v. Sturges
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
WELBORN, Commissioner.
This is an action for declaratory judgment respecting the validity of certain provisions of statutes regulating the practice of optometry in Missouri, 1 and rules promulgated by the Missouri State Board of Optometry.
Appellant Coliman H. Ketring is a licensed and registered optometrist tinder the Missouri law. He is also the president and a stockholder of the Mo-Ark Optical Company, a Missouri corporation. Appellant Hugh Williamson, an optician, who is neither a licensed optometrist nor a licensed physician or surgeon, is an employee of Mo-Ark.
On March 20, 1962, a letter…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Abelson's, Inc. v. New Jersey State Board of OptometristsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Sage-Allen Co., Inc. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Borden Company v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Foremost-McKesson, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Williams v. MarshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Carp v. Texas State Board of Examiners in OptometryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Londerholm v. DoolinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Missourians for Honest Elections v. Missouri Elections CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.