Legal Opinion

Dellinger v. Arkansas State Board of Optometry

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 7, 1949No. 4-8726PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtG-eorge Rose Smith, J.

This is an action to enjoin Melford E. Dellinger, Joseph Zeman and Dr. Phil Thomas * from violating Act 94 of 1941 — a statute governing the practice of optometry. Dellinger is the owner of Mel-ford’s Jewelers & Opticians, and Zeman is the manager. The testimony shows that customers entering Melford’s to obtain eyeglasses are referred to Dr. Thomas, a physician having his office in a neighboring building in Little Rock. In some instances a deposit upon the price of the glasses is taken before the customer leaves Melford’s. Dr. Thomas then examines the patient’s eyes and prescribes glasses…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  2. In the Matter of the Petition for Naturalization of Brenda Barbara WeitzmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  3. STATE Ex Rel REED v. KUZIRIANOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Arkansas State Board of Optometry v. KellerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  5. State v. RonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API