Dellinger v. Arkansas State Board of Optometry
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtG-eorge Rose Smith, J.
This is an action to enjoin Melford E. Dellinger, Joseph Zeman and Dr. Phil Thomas * from violating Act 94 of 1941 — a statute governing the practice of optometry. Dellinger is the owner of Mel-ford’s Jewelers & Opticians, and Zeman is the manager. The testimony shows that customers entering Melford’s to obtain eyeglasses are referred to Dr. Thomas, a physician having his office in a neighboring building in Little Rock. In some instances a deposit upon the price of the glasses is taken before the customer leaves Melford’s. Dr. Thomas then examines the patient’s eyes and prescribes glasses…
2Cited by5 opinions
- State v. RonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- In the Matter of the Petition for Naturalization of Brenda Barbara WeitzmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- STATE Ex Rel REED v. KUZIRIANOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Arkansas State Board of Optometry v. KellerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- State v. RonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953