State Ex Rel. Sisemore v. Standard Optical Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHay, J.
By leave of court, the State of Oregon, on the relation of the district attorney for Klamath County, commenced this proceeding by the filing of an information in quo warranto, charging the defendant, a private corporation, with having unlawfully engaged in the practice of optometry, and praying judgment of ouster of defendant from its corporate rights, privileges and franchises. The defendant answered, admitting its existence as a corporation, but otherwise denying generally the allegations of the information. A hearing was had before the court without a jury, and the court thereafter made…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- State v. Port of TillamookOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Painless Parker v. Board of Dental Exam.California Supreme Court · 1932
- McMurdo v. GetterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- People v. United Medical Service, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1936
- Dvorine v. Castelberg Jewelry Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kee v. BaberTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- MacK v. SaarsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Pearle Optical of Monroeville, Inc. v. State Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Neiss v. EhlersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Board of OptometryMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.