Legal Opinion

Frank v. South

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 4, 1917PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Chancery Branch, Second Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hurt

Reversing.

The appellees are the members of the State Board of Health. The facts agreed upon and upon which the action is based will definitely describe the personnel of the appellants and their interest in the controversy, as vell as the question to be determined. The action is an agreed one. The statement of facts agreed upon is substantially as follows:

The appellant, Louis Frank, is a duly licensed physician and surgeon and has complied with all of the requirements of the law, which regulate the practice of medicine, in this state. However, he limits his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Beile v. Travelers Protective Ass'n of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. People v. GordonIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Driscoll v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
  4. Hargan v. PurdyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
  5. State v. MylodSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Weill v. State Ex Rel. GaillardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Cooper v. State Bd. of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State v. CatellierWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Thrasher v. Board of GovernorsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. STATE Ex Rel REED v. KUZIRIANOregon Supreme Court · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API