Attorney General v. Kenco Optics, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtBraucher, J.
By this action for declaratory and injunctive relief, the Attorney General presents the question whether a licensed dispensing optician may continue to fit contact lenses to the human eye. Like the trial judge, we hold that until the Legislature speaks further the practice is not illegal. The action should not have been dismissed, however; we order a new judgment declaring the rights of the parties.
The Attorney General brought the action in the Superior Court in 1970. Demurrers were overruled in 1971, and the case was tried in December, 1974, on a stipulation of facts, oral testimony and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Haverhill Manor, Inc. v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Secretary of Administration & Finance v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Chase v. Proprietors of the Revere HouseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- People Ex Rel. Watson v. House of VisionIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Consolidated Cigar Corp. v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Harvard Crimson, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Royal-Globe Insurance v. CravenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Massachusetts Federation of Teachers v. Board of EducationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- City of Boston v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.