Legal Opinion

High v. Ridgeway's Opticians

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1963No. 459PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, C.J.

The determinative question on this appeal is whether or not the use of a keratometer by a duly licensed optician in the measurement of the curvature of the cornea, and the subsequent fabrication and fitting of contact lenses as prescribed by a medical doctor or oculist, constitute the unlawful practice of optometry as defined in G.S. 90-114.

G.S. 90-114 defines the practice of optometry as follows: “The practice of optometry is hereby defined to be the employment of any means, other than the use of drugs, medicines, or surgery, for the measurement of the powers of vision and the adaptation of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Town of Burnsville v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. STATE Ex Rel REED v. KUZIRIANOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Logan v. SprinkleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Wilson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Kovacs v. BrewerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. Kenco Optics, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. People Ex Rel. Watson v. House of VisionIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. BD. OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY v. SpitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Ketring v. SturgesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. State Ex Rel. Londerholm v. DoolinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API