Daugherty v. Young
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, J.
Defendant appeals from the decree rescinding a residential land sale contract between him as seller and plaintiff as buyer. The issue on appeal is whether the decree of rescission restored the parties, as nearly as possible, to their situation prior to the transaction. See Bodenhamer v. Patterson, 278 Or 367, 376, 563 P2d 1212 (1977); LeTrace v. Elms, 40 Or App 561, 563, 595 P2d 1281 (1979).
Buyer sued to rescind her contract for purchase of a home, alleging that seller knew that bees periodically swarm inside the dwelling but failed to disclose this fact. The parties stipulated: (1) that the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bodenhamer v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Lanners v. WhitneyOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Schuler Et Ux. v. Humphrey Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Weiss and Hamilton v. GumbertOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Swick v. MUELLER ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Fowler v. CooleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Neidermeyer v. LatimerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Sang Jun Lee v. Chan Sik YangCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- (BK) Svenhard's Swedish Bakery v. United States BakeryDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022