Legal Opinion

State v. Pettit

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 1, 1985No. 139,588, 146,611, 146,972 CA A32993 (Control), CA A32994, CA A32995PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant appeals from a restitution order, contending that money he was paid for cocaine by police officers is not “pecuniary damages” within the meaning of ORS 137.103 and therefore cannot form the basis of the order. We affirm.

Defendant was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(1), arising from his sale of cocaine to Salem police officers during the course of a criminal investigation. As part of his sentence, he was ordered to make restitution to the Salem Police Department for the amount he received in the illegal transaction. He argues that the money paid by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DillonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Oregon & Western Colonization Co. v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Daugherty v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. GibbensCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. MourarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. State v. TaylorNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. RoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Igbinovia v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API